Saturday, September 10, 2016
The Chicago Tribune: Why ObamaCare Failed
It is newsworthy
when the Chicago Tribune uses the past tense to describe ObamaCare. The
editorial board of the Tribune gives
these reasons why ObamaCare “failed,” as if that was a foregone conclusion.
Here are reasons
the Tribune offers.
·
It
flunked Economics 101 and Human Nature 101.
It wasn’t flexible enough to let people buy as much or as little
coverage as they wanted or could afford.
·
Its
penalty for going uninsured ($695) were too low when stacked against skyrocketing
premiums so people simpy skipped coverage.
·
It
didn’t recognize the essence of insurance risk pools - the lucky (the healthy) have to subsidize the
unlucky (the sick). The sick reap much
greater benefits thatn the healthy, yet
insurers can’t exclude the sick, those with preconditions, or even ask them
what ails them.
·
It
allows Americans to sign up even after they got sick. If you can buy insurance after you get sick,
why buy it before you get sick.
·
It
did not decrease health costs. It
increased demand for care while decreasing supply of physicians and choices of plans.
·
It
ignored the fact that too many carriers could not cover their expenses, or
created condition that carriers could not even estimate those expenses in
advance. For every dollar earned, insurers paid out $1.32 for services rendered. Small wonder insurers, business beholden to
stakeholders and shareholders, abandon
ObamaCare markets and raise premiums by double digits, sometimes by 45% to 60%,
to offset losses.
The Tribune
suggests federal authorities offer more flexible plans to let consumers buy what’s
best for them, not coddle them by letting them duck in and out of the
system, when the need or don’t need
care. The new plan, says the Tribune,
should kill the employer mandate, and instead offer tax credits for hiring and
covering new employees. And let insurers
compete across state lines. Competition
is a wonderful antidote for charging
what the market will bear.
To these
ObamaCare’s failings I would add this simple caveat. Get over the notion that government can
homogenize and standardize care through
centralized control. Homogeneity
and standardization violate two fundamental American values – pluralism and
self-determination. There is not
simple, magical, structural, managerial
answer to universal, affordable, acceptable
universal coverage – no management data-based “value’ evidence, no quality control measures, no compensation by performance, and no amount of collaborative, cooperative
synergistic efforts by federal authorities to enforce ethical and elitist “truths” as perceived in
Washington rather than on the frontlines of care.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment