Tuesday, June 3, 2014
Interview with Charles Sauer, Executive Director of Free
Market Medical Association
Market competition is the only form of organization which can
afford a large measure of freedom to the individual.
Frank Hyneman Knight (1885-1974), Freedom and Reform (1947)
Charles Sauer is a 34 year old Washington-based economist who
heads up the newly formed Free Market Medical
Association. Working in concert with Keith Smith, MD, founder
and CEO of the Oklahoma Surgery Center, as well as Jay Kempton,
President of the Kempton Group, Sauer aims to organize a coalition of primary
care physicians, specialists, ambulatory surgery and
diagnostic centers, hospitals, third party
administrators, self-funded corporations, and consumer groups to
develop a transparent, direct, cash oriented,
affordable system of care independent
of involvement by government and insurers.
Q: Tell me about yourself.
A: I am executive director of the Free Market Medical
Association. We have been an official entity for just over 3
months, but our founders have all been on the cutting edge of the free market
medical revolution.
Q: What is your background? Why have you assumed this position?
A: I’m an economist. I believe there
needs to be a change in the system. I am the father of two
little girls, age 1 and 3, and all of us recently lost our health
care plans when they were not compliant with ObamaCare exchange
plans. The government is telling us what kind of insurance we should
have, and I do not believe government has that prerogative.
As far as my background, I’ ve been on Capitol Hill
for 10 years in a Senator’s office, a governor’s office, and a think
tank that specialized in free market health care. And, 2007 I formed the
Market Institute to educate Congressmen and their staffs about the principles
of capitalism and entrepreneurship by working with free market think tanks and
associations including the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons.
The Assocation started when I met Dr. Keith Smith, who heads up
the Oklahoma Surgery Center. We made the rounds of Congress
together, and we realized the need for a Free Market Medical Association.
Q: How do you define “free market medicine?”
A: The ability of patients to contract directly with
the doctor. As things stand now, the government often steps in and decides
what kind of care will be provided and how much it will cost, and large insurers
tend to follow the government’s lead. This top down approach currently
dominates health care. Dr. Keith Smith cut through all of this by posting his
Surgery Center’s prices online. hysicians practice differently – they
can give discounts, provide charitable care, spend more time with patients, bundle
their services, and most importantly come up with ever more efficient ways to
provide an increasing quality of care at lower prices because that is how they
compete for more business. That can’t be done with
government plans.
Q: What do you say to those who say only the government and
insurers can assure quality and prevent market abuse?
A: Government and insurers cannot assure
quality. They can restrict care, issue guidelines, limit
choices to fit their budgets, reduce care, prolong waiting lines, or fail to
pay, but they cannot assure quality. In the end, only
consumers should value, and in a free market doctors must compete to
provide that quality quickly, directly, and transparently. The
reason the Oklahoma Surgery Center works is that everything is transparent,
and direct with almost no waiting.
Q: The Oklahoma Surgery Center has no waiting room?
A: My point is that if you call Doctor Smith or any
other direct pay physician, you can likely get in
tomorrow. When my daughter had her eye surgery, we waited
3 months. There’s a difference between a waiting room, and a
reception area.
Q: Would it be fair to say Free Market Medicine is medicine
without 3rd party intervention?
A: It is that, but the primary idea is to move in a
direction that provides the patient more power- more ability to contract
directly with the doctor.
At the Free Market Medical Association, we are working to
unify doctors and other players in the market by showing them that
the free market is the best way to practice medicine for both the physician and
the patient and showing self-insured businesses and other payers that free
market medicine is the most cost-efficient method of providing quality care for
their employees.
We are trying to unify actors in the health care
market. We are trying to promote the presence of free market
medicine practitioners and to let people know they exist. The more
people use these practitioners and more pleased they are, the less
controversial free market medicine becomes.
Q: Another association goal is to lower health costs by
cutting out the middleman. We have to keep in mind that
collectively doctors account for only 20% of health costs, and primary
care 6% of that. Am I right?
A: You are right on the numbers, but we don’t know what the
market mix should be. We really only know one fact: Anytime that
competition is introduced to the market prices decrease and quality increases. That
can happen by eliminating the middle man, but in other instances that can
happen through MediBid, that can happen through the use of product like the
“Zero Card”, or in the case of many self-insured businesses their Third Party
Administrator may just start promoting a cash pay physician. Sometimes,
third parties can make health care more effective and efficient, but only when
they are designed to promote competition. Competition is what has the ability
to identify the true cost of health care. For instance, Dr. Smith and the Surgery
Center of Oklahoma, by competing with hospitals, have started defining the
true cost of health care in the Oklahoma metro.
Q. What are you saying – that the true cost is
something that is currently unknown and is hiding behind bureaucratic medicine?
A: When nobody competes, no one person knows
what things truly cost. Competition drives down costs, and drives up
quality. Take the Oklahoma Surgery Center. It had a zero percent
infection rate in 2012. No other hospital I know of can say
that. Dr. Smith recently contracted with Oklahoma County, and in the
first 3 weeks of the contract, he saved the county
$140,000. Free market health care changes the way we think about
cost and quality.
Q: Who would you like to be members of the Free Market Medical
Association?
A: Doctors, other health care providers, facilities, third-party
administrators, self-insured businesses, banks, and
others. We have different membership
levels. All of these individuals and entities make up the
market. We are trying to unify the islands of excellence, a phras
e Peter Orzag of the Obama administration was fond of using. Entrepreneurs,
not government, usually create these islands of excellence, these new business
models.
Q: You are a creature of Washington. And while
there, you created something called the Market Institute. What
was that Institute all about?
A: I started the Market Institute 6 years ago after
being in Washington for 5 years. I formed it to represent and
teach the principles of capitalism and ideas by working with free market
institutes and associations. Through the Institute I have had the
opportunity to work with many organizations including, the Association of
American Physicians and Surgeons, the Ayn Rand Institute,
Entrepreneurs for Growth, The Savings and Retirement Foundation, the National
Tax Limitation Committee, the National Center for Policy Analysis and few
others. Through all of these, I teach capitalism and
entrepreneurship on Capitol Hill to Capitol Hill
staffers. Many of these staffers are young, well-educated,
extremely smart, and want to change the world for the better, but they
have not been exposed to how capitalism works. The Market
Institute is my other hat.
Tweet: Charles Sauer, executive director of
the Free Market Medical Association, believes that free markets will
promote competition, lower costs, improve quality, and speed access to health
care. @marketmedicine
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment