Medical Experts and the American People
Believe one who has proven it. Believe an expert.
Virgil (70-19BC), Aeneid
An expert is one who knows less and less about more and
more.
Nicholas Butler (1862-1947), Commencement Address, Columbia University
April 1, 2012 - Medical experts dominate medicine - or think they do and should.
Government
experts, mostly situated in Washington and Boston, tell us evidence from outcome based studies,
should serve as a guide as to what tests and procedures to order and to do.
Health
plan experts in giant firms, such as
Aetna, Wellpoint, Cigna, and the United Healthcare, are fond of deploying data to instruct doctors and patients as to what constitutes the “best practices” and what
they will or will not pay for.
Presumably, these experts, relying on vast databases
which they have parsed, analyzed, and summarized, will present us with objective impartial data
to direct care to produce the best results.
I
say “presumably” because many patients or doctors do not necessarily buy the experts’
advice or follow instructions.
The Problem in a Nutshell
Culturally,
the United States is a nation whose people believe
everybody puts on their pants the same way, one leg at a time. They instinctively embrace the notion that there is no
single best way to do anything. In the end,
they believe they have a right to choose what to do, based on their particular
individual preferences.
This
is not just my opinion. A husband and
wife team of doctors from the Harvard Medical School faculty,
Pamela Hartzband MD and Jerome
Groopman MD, have picked up on this theme. On March 31, they wrote a learned article in
the Wall Street Journal “The Rise of Medical Expertocracy” on the subject containing these observations.
“As As the health-care debate
heats up again in Washington, both Democrats and Republicans will try to
convince us that they have the experts to answer all our health questions.”
“President Barack Obama and
the Democrats propose panels of government experts to evaluate treatments and,
in the president's words, "Figure out what works and what doesn't."
“Republicans claim that the
free market (that is, insurance companies with their own experts) will pay for
value and empower consumers. Both sides insist that no one will come between us
and our doctors.”
“Democrats and Republicans share a fundamental
misconception about medical care. Both assume that, as in mathematics, there is
a single right answer for every health problem. These "’ practices,’ they
believe, can be found by gathering large amounts of data for experts to
analyze. The experts will then identify remedies based strictly on
science—impartial and objective.”
“For
patients and experts alike, there is a subjective core to every medical
decision. The truth is that, despite many advances, much of medicine still
exists in a gray zone where there is not one right answer. No one can say with
certainty who will benefit by taking a certain drug and who will not. Nor can
we say with certainty what impact a medical condition will have on someone's
life or how they might experience a treatment's side effects. The path to
maintaining or regaining health is not the same for everyone; our preferences
really do matter.”
I agree with these observations and
conclusions. In the end, there is usually no single right answer to treating an
individual, and patients, in conjunction with their doctors, have the right to
choose what to do.
Tweet: Despite the rise of medical experts, armed
with vast accumulations of data, there
still exists no single answer to most medical problems.
No comments:
Post a Comment