Friday, July 1, 2011
Electronic Medical Records May Not Be What They Are Cracked Up To Be
July 1, 2011- Sometimes it takes a while for the truth to sink in. In this case, the truth is: electronic medical records may not be what they are cracked up to be. Many doctors in small practices feel:
• EHRs often cost more than they are worth.
• They slow up practice.
• They may not prevent errors.
• They dehumanize practice by getting between the doctor and the patient.
It is, of course, impolitic to question the value of EHRs. If you do so, you are considered a Luddite, a reactionary stuck in the muck. But some of us continue our wayward ways anyway, as I do repeatedly in my book The Health Reform Maze (Greenbranch Publishing), due out later this summer.
Small practices have joined the chorus. As a June 30 Kaiser Health News piece, points out: only 7% of one or two person practices have installed EHRs. The voices of dissenting small practices is beginning to be heard.
Small Doc Groups Question Advantages of Health IT
By Bara Vaida
The government is offering as much as $27 billion in incentives to doctors and hospitals to adopt electronic health records, but the question is whether those incentives will be enough.
A new study published by the Center for Studying Health System Change and the National Institute for Health Care Reform illustrates the difficulty of getting everyone in the health care system to adopt electronic records.
The two organizations found that some physician practices with 25 or fewer doctors who were early adapters of electronic health records are unsure that their investment of time and money has been worth it.
“Despite the widely held belief that HIT adoption ultimately will save costs and improve quality, several respondents suggested the business case – adequate financial incentives and return on investment – remains somewhat unclear, especially in the short term,” said the report.
The study focused on five independent practice associations (IPAs) that had purchased health information technology systems to enable a range of functions from sending prescriptions to pharmacies electronically to accessing local laboratory and hospital clinical information. IPAs are legal entities that represent groups of independent physicians who have agreed to share in support costs. To gather information for the survey, the institute telephoned 27 people involved in the IPAs between March and May 2010.
Among the problems the early adapters cited were technical difficulties and lack of training offered by health IT providers, lost productivity while staff learned to use the electronic systems, and the inability to get systems to talk to other electronic health systems.
Nationally, only 7 percent of doctors with one or two physicians have adopted electronic health systems. Since more than half of doctors practice in groups of five or fewer doctors, physicians have a long way to go in joining the age of health IT.
Despite the challenges listed in the study, the Center for Studying Health System Change and the National Institute for Health Care Reform said the challenges faced by these early adapters could serve as lessons learned to help small physician groups, who likely will have to buy health IT systems if they want to treat Medicare patients in the future. As part of the health law, doctors treating Medicare patients will face a penalty if they aren’t using electronic records by 2015.
Posted by Richard L. Reece, MD at 10:38 AM
Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)
It can't have effect in fact, that is exactly what I suppose.
Hi, I log on to your new stuff regularly.
Your humoristic style is awesome, keep doing what
Also visit my homepage mouse click the next internet page
Have you ever considered creating an e-book or guest authoring on other sites?
I have a blog centered on the same subjects you discuss and would love to have
you share some stories/information. I know my subscribers would enjoy your work.
If you're even remotely interested, feel free to shoot me an e mail.
my web-site buygarciniacambogianow.net
I believe what you published was very logical.
However, what about this? what if you were to write a killer post title?
I am not suggesting your information isn't good, however suppose you added a title that grabbed people's attention?
I mean "Electronic Medical Records May Not Be What They Are Cracked Up To Be" is a little
plain. You might glance at Yahoo's home page and see how they create article headlines to get people to click. You might add a video or a related picture or two to grab people excited about everything've got to say.
In my opinion, it might bring your website a little livelier.
Here is my homepage ... Buy Xtrasize
Just desire to say your article is as astounding. The clearness in your
post is just great and i can assume you're an expert on this subject. Fine with your permission let me to grab your RSS feed to keep updated with forthcoming post. Thanks a million and please continue the gratifying work.
Also visit my webpage :: Saphire Ecig Review
I read this article completely about the resemblance of
most recent and preceding technologies, it's amazing article.
my site; Pur Essence Anti Wrinkle
I think this is one of the most important information for me.
And i am glad reading your article. But should remark on some general things, The
web site style is great, the articles is really excellent : D.
Good job, cheers
Feel free to visit my site; Rejuvenex Skin Care
I just like the valuable information you supply in your articles.
I'll bookmark your blog and check again right here regularly. I am moderately certain I will learn lots of new stuff right right here! Best of luck for the following!
Visit my weblog ... Lift serum
Pretty nice post. I just stumbled upon your weblog and wished to say that I have really enjoyed browsing your blog posts.
In any case I'll be subscribing to your rss feed and I hope you write again very soon!
Review my blog post; muscle enhancers
Great post. I'm facing a few of these issues as well..
Hydrellatone review ()
Post a Comment