Friday, October 7, 2016
ObamaCare
Chaos
In Minnesota,
Oklahoma, and Tennessee, three
states in which I have lived or practiced,
ObamaCare premium rates are skyrocketing into the 50% to 67% range, insurers are pulling out and citizens are
losing plans and choices, and chaos reigns.
What does it all mean?
I was speaking to Dave Racer, a conservative publisher in
Minnesota. He says ObamaCare is unstable
there, and major insurers are either increasing premiums, capping enrollment, or pulling out of health exchange markets. He
says if the Democratic Farmer Labor Market wins the next election there, a universal coverage plan will be on the
horizon within 18 months.
ObamaCare
Alternatives
If ObamaCare health exchange markets fail, and ObamaCare
goes down the tube, these options remain.
·
Universal single payer, unlikely no matter who wins the presidency
·
A public option, if Clinton wins, with other
fixes, such as ending individual and
employer options, moving the 55 to 65 crowd into Medicare, raising taxes for
everyone.
·
ObamaCare repeal, if Trump wins, with a
market-based plan – competition across state line, expansion of health saving accounts, management of Medicaid by states – and God
knows what else.
·
Management of clinical medicine by machines and
algorithms, if progressively minded government
experts have their way (Z, OBermeyer,M.D. and E.J. Emanuel , MD. of Harvard and
Wharton (“Predicting the Future – Big Data, Machine Learning and Clinical
Medicine, NEJM. September 29.”
Ekekial
Emaneul Opinions
Ekekiel Emanuel is one of the principle architects of
ObamaCare. He blames the Republicans for
the health law’s problems and says with more government money poured into “risk corridors,” the health exchanges could be stabilized and
insurer death spirals could be prevented,
Emanuel and co-author argue,
that given time and money could solve complex clinical problems and “open up
vast new possibilities in medicine.”
Machine learning will one, “dramatically improve the ability of professionals
to establish a prognosis,” two,” displace much of the work of radiologists and
anatomical pathologists,” three, “improve diagnostic accuracy.”
My
Opinion
In my opinion, the health law’s
travails result from the ACA being
passed without a single Republican vote, thereby triggering partisan
opposition, and from ignorance of the
concept of insurance risk by not
allowing insurers to ask about pre-existing conditions.
As far as “machine learning”
goes, I would point out that electronic
medical records, have been a bust in the medical marketing space, neither increasing efficiency, or improving
quality in terms of diagnosis and prognosis.
I doubt that diagnostic
algorithms will significant displace radiologists or pathologists. Data has a place as a supplement, but not as
a replacement of these specialties.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment