Tuesday, October 23, 2012
The
Last Obama-Romney Debate, American Culture, and Entrepreneurialism
Culture
is not life in its entirety, but just the moment of security, strength, and
clarity.
Joe
Oretga y Gasset (1883-1955), Meditations
October
23, 2011 - I’m mulling over what I think of last night’s last
debate between President Obama and Governor Romney. The debate said nothing to about the health system and everything
about where we want to be as a nation.
The choice is between our current entrepreneurial culture and a future
secure government-based culture. The
choice is about entrepreneurial risk-taking vs. government guaranteed economic
security.
Romney argued
that our security rests on our economic strength and our clarity in expressing
and applying that strength. Obama, on
the other hand, seems to be saying our strength lies in economic equality
between the haves and have-not and the political equality between nations.
The American culture in this center-right
capitalistic nation defines the limits of health reform.
Our culture believes in,
·
the exceptionalism of the American
medical system
·
in individualism rather than
collectivism
·
the God-given right of patients and
doctors to make decisions
·
in entrepreneurs taking risks and
supplying the seed corn that grows the American economy
·
in equal opportunity rather than equal
outcomes
·
in over-regulation and over-taxing as
the main cause of an under-performing economy.
When I say this, I may be suffering from the opiate
of exceptionalism, from ignoring these realities. As Scott Shane, a reporter for the New York
Times, points out, we are number 1, all
right:
·
in small arms ownership
·
in incarcerating our citizen, at higher rates than
Russia, Cuba, Iran or China
·
in obesity, easily outweighing No. 2
Mexico and nearly ten times the rate of Japan
·
in energy use per person, double that of
German.
Even worse, says Shane, we rank 48th in infant
mortality, 14th in percent of citizens with higher education, and
36the in childhood poverty. S
We are not a perfect society, nor do we purport to
be. But, for all our imperfections, we
are free – free to act as we please, free to say how we feel, free to make our health
care decisions. We are even free to call our political opponents liars as the New York Times did in an October 21 editorial
on health care, “Twisting the Facts about Health Care, How the Republicans
Ticket Has Been Misrepresenting Its Plan, and If Not Lying.”
But as Carl Schramm a professor at Syracuse and co-author
with Robert E. Litan of Better Capitalism,
just published by Yale, so cogently argues: entrepreneurs are the crown jewels
of the American economy. They, not
government, produced over 60% of all new jobs.
This is evident from the successes of the likes of Mark Zuckerberg, Bill
Gates, and Steve Jobs. Other than
Israel, no country produces more new businesses perk capital than the U.S.
Nearly 70% of high school student aspire to be an entrepreneur. Most parents
think having a son running a small business or a successful medial practice ranks
right up there with being President.
Entrepreneurs from around the world flock to America. This election, says Schramm, is about the role of entrepreneurs in the economy
and how to unleash their talents without killing their dreams with excessive
taxes and regulations.
Tweet: The
coming Presidential election is about capitalism vs. a government-controlled economy
and about unleashing entrepreneurs among us.
Sources
1. Scott
Shane, “The Opiate of Exceptionalism, “ New York Times, October 21, 2012.
2. Editorial,
“Twisting the Facts about Health Care: How the Republican Ticket Has Been Misrepresenting Its Plans, If
Not Lying, New York Times, October 21, 2012.
3. Carl
Schramm, “Elections about Econ9omy is about Entrpreneurs,” Real Clear Markets, October 223, 2012.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
Be very careful in the use of infant mortality stats in international comparisons. It is pretty well-known that there isn't a shared standard around the world for what consitutes a live birth. For example, very low weight infants are not counted in some countries, but are tabulated in the USA numbers.
I'm aware of this discrepancy in infant mortality statistics. Ours are low because we count the very low infants while others do not. We save more of these tiny infants. too. Thansk for the reminder.
Post a Comment