The
Obama Stigma and Dogma
Any
stigma will do to beat a dogma.
Phillip
Guedalla (1889-1944), British barrister and popular writer
GOP attack ads on ObamaCare,
38,000 of them, are taking their
toll. In poor states, in Appalachia and elsewhere, generally in the South, people are not signing up for private plans on the health
exchanges. (Jackie Calmes, “In Poorer
States, Political Stigma Is Depressing Participation in Health Law, “ New York Times, April 26, 2014).
The Obama administration and Democratic candidates for
Congress are being stigmatized by the Republican attack ad campaign. Of
38,000 GOP ads so far, 76% have been negative about ObamaCare. The ads say costs are up, healthcare.gov is a
disaster, premiums are deductibles are
out of sight, people are losing their health
plans, businesses aren’t hiring, new workers are mostly part-time, doctors are hard to find, economic growth is
stagnant – all because of ObamaCare.
In poorer states, especially in a state like West Virginia, the GOP bad news stigma appears to be beating the Democratic
good news dogma. That dogma says the law is bringing down overall costs, the number of
uninsured is dropping, minorities and
the poor are finally getting coverage,
ads paid for by those evil Koch brothers in undermining the good things inherent in ObamaCare, and all
those those negative stories about plans
being cancelled are either concocted anecdotes or outright lies.
According to the Times
writer, the failure of good news to beat
bad news is due to a combination of factors – unremitting hatred for President
Obama, unfamiliarity with insurance, computer illiteracy, lack of cultural sophistication, misunderstanding about costs and
subsidies, and, by implication, sheer ignorance of what ObamaCare brings to
the health care table.
How are Democrats reacting to this bad news-good new, this stigma-dogma
imbroglio?
By not talking about it.
By not talking about it.
In
50 Democrat candidates websites, only 11
mention the law by name, and half don’t mention it at all. Among Democrat senate candidates, 14 of 20
avoid the subject altogether.
Not bringing up the subject makes sense when you consider that in 458 national polls since 2009, 95.5% say they don’t like the law, 65.3% by double digit margins, and when you take these factors into account:
·
A health law that requires 2700 pages to explain
may be inexplicable.
·
A health law that requires 10,535 pages and 1.15 million
words to enforce its new regulations may be unenforceable.
·
A health law that requires $2.5 trillion over 10
years to implement (OMB estimate) may be unaffordable.
Tweet: ObamaCare
stigma, as portrayed by the GOP, may, in the public's mind, outweigh benefits described by Obama dogma.
**( If
you wish to comment, email me at doctor.reece@gmail.com
or call me 1-860-395-1501. I am
available for writing columns or commentary and for speaking engagements.)
No comments:
Post a Comment