tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6076839327674215825.post6537842368625299768..comments2024-03-27T05:14:34.288-04:00Comments on Medinnovation And Health Reform: Doctor patient relationships - Who Should Health Care Consumer Trust?Richard L. Reece, MDhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03446550629857699574noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6076839327674215825.post-70373381838278770662007-03-19T21:58:00.000-04:002007-03-19T21:58:00.000-04:00I also agree.. the health care consumer must take ...I also agree.. the health care consumer must take control , to some reasonable degree, of his medical care. I do not think Governmental control is the correct entity to intervene in an individual's health care or a doctor's treatment, diagnosis, etc.. the first step in consumer control is a personal health record. <BR/>As a physician and founder of PassportMD, Inc. (http://www.PassportMD.com ) , I remain committed to creating a free site and service so that people of any age and any economic status can participate. The free service helps people through the often-tedious process of creating a very valuable, and potentially life saving tool, the personal health record. We are committed to simplifying this process, giving people, seniors, adults, children, particularly with a history of at least one chronic medical disease, on multiple medications, or with a history of allergies access to a system that can help save their lives. Doctors need to have access to reliable information that is legible and accessible and PassportMD provides this needed function. <BR/>Medical Mistakes are common, hospital errors are responsible for over 100,000 deaths per year and these could be preventable. Information about drug interactions and cross reactivity combined with allergy alerts lead the way in being critical to every healthcare provider before initiating care. At PassportMD.com we have created a very easy way to solicit this information from individuals and host it so that they may access it or print it off in times of need at no charge and as often as they would like. <BR/><BR/>Scenarios where this type of service makes the most sense is baby boomers that are responsible for managing their elderly parents’ medical care and doctors’ visits, or seniors that live alone or are responsible for managing their own care and visits to their doctors. Or, “snowbirds” that share many doctors between more than one state would benefit from PassportMD.com. Alternatively, children, before they go to summer camp, if they have an allergy or take chronic medications for chronic problems. Anyone with any chronic disease, diabetes, hypertension, heart disease, for example would benefit from the free PassportMD.com service. Additionally, active, healthy individuals that are pro-active with their health in preparation for unexpected and unpredictable medical problems would benefit from PassportMD.com. People that travel frequently, cruise to the islands, or boat, would be especially susceptible to medical emergencies without their accurate medical history. <BR/>The doctors are very slowly adopting electronic health records. This adoption is way too slow and is very complicated. It has many factors in play as it relates to the economics of medicine. Although privacy is considered an issue, the true issue is cost, implementation and maintanence costs to the physician practice are too burdensome in light of decreasing reimbursement. Thus, only 7.5 % of physician practices are currently adopting electronic health records. Though, if you poll the remaining 92.5% of physicians, probably all would agree that electronic health records are better for medicine and for the patient. Adoption is inevitable but the pace and time period for adoption is dependent upon many factors.Steven M Hacker,MD , Dermatologisthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10799117527024682506noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6076839327674215825.post-5569860451665033722007-03-19T11:20:00.000-04:002007-03-19T11:20:00.000-04:00I totally agree with your stand – government can p...I totally agree with your stand – government can plug some holes, but patients are individuals, not statistics – and ultimately the doctor still knows best.<BR/><BR/>We must offload medical practices with IT solutions so that the physician has more time to spend with her patients. Pressuring docs to see 30+ patients a day undermines the very best chance that we have of getting good care to people, because as doctors become more removed (how much can you really understand/know about a patient if you only see them for 5 minutes?) they become no better at doing the right thing than a distant bureaucratic entity.<BR/><BR/>We must fight to save the medical home. Outcomes depend upon it. Personalized healthcare depends on it. Patient satisfaction depends on it. Lives depend on it.<BR/><BR/>My 2 cents.Dr. Valhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10481032355977889911noreply@blogger.com